Ilchester Gaol

Just a couple of months after Mary Stevens was held at Ilchester gaol, Jane Leigh-Perrott was being held at the Ilchester gaol awaiting her own trial at Taunton. Unlike Mary Stevens, Jane Leigh-Perrott was in many of the local and National Newspapers for months with full coverage of her trial and statements by herself and all relevant witnesses.[1]

Jane Leigh Perrott was the aunt of Jane Austen. She came from a well off and titled family and had all of the advantages of wealth and birth that Mary Stevens did not have. [2] Thus life was very different for the two classes of inmates. Mary Stevens was limited to one courtyard room crowded with all the other female prisoners, with no occupation for any of the prisoners so they had little to do with their time. As a result the female ward was described as a place of dissolution and profligacy, just six years later when the gaol was being assessed and improvements organised.[3]

A Peep into a Prison; or, the Inside of Ilchester Bastile 1821 https://www.bl.uk/collection­items/account­of­poor­prisonconditions­at­ilchester­by­henry­hunt#sthash.pDu9Xmdh.dpuf

A Peep into a Prison; or, the Inside of Ilchester Bastile 1821 https://www.bl.uk/collection­items/account­of­poor­prisonconditions­at­ilchester­by­henry­hunt#sthash.pDu9Xmdh.dpuf

Mary Stevens would have had an uncomfortable time in Ilchester gaol. The experience of Jane Leigh Perrott would have been very different. Much as Jane Leigh Perrott complained of her situation the realities were far less uncomfortable than those of the other female prisoners. Jane, herself was housed in a room adjoining the gaolers rooms. She gives brief descriptions of the gaol and of her situation in the gaol- “Vulgarity, Dirt, Noise from Morning till night…”[4]

…the Man told me that the Dining Room I was to consider as my own whenever I choose to be along- and so it was till the Fires began; but this Room joins to a Room where the Children all lie, and not Bedlam itself can be half so noisy, beside which, as not one particule [sic] of Smoke goes up the Chimney, except you leave the door or window open, I leave you to judge of the Comfort I can enjoy in such a Room.[5]

 Jane Leigh Perrott was accused of stealing a card of lace worth twenty shilling from a shop in Bath. She was arrested in August of 1799 but was not able to obtain bail.[6] Thus she stayed with the Ilchester gaoler until the Lent Assize of 1800. This was the same Assize that Mary Stevens had her sentence confirmed at, before being transported to New South Wales for the term of seven years.[7] Jane Leigh Perrot was acquitted.[8]

 Mary Stevens

[1] Gale Newspapers. 1800 Somerset Assizes ‘The Reading Mercury and Oxford Gazette’ Reading, England, Monday, April 07, 1800; pg. 3; Issue 1993. British Library Newspapers, Part III: 1741-1950. Viewed 1 June 2016.

[2] The Jane Austen Centre. ‘The Life and Times of Jane Leigh-Perrot. Posted June 16 2011. http://www.janeausten.co.uk/the-life-and-crimes-of-jane-leigh-perrot/ (Accessed 1st June 2016)

[3] Guttenburg Project. A Narrative of the  Rise and Progress of the Improvements Effected at His Majesties Gaol at Ilchester Between July 1806 and November 1821. https://archive.org/stream/anarrativerisea00bridgoog/anarrativerisea00bridgoog_djvu.txt  (Accessed 1st June 2016)

[4] Austen Papers 1704-1856. Edited by Austen- Leigh, R. A. 1942. Published by Spottiswoode, Ballantyne & Co. Ltd. http://www.janeaustensfamily.co.uk/austen-reading/introduction/introduction.index.html (Accessed 26th May 2016)

[5] Austen Papers 1704-1856. Edited by Austen- Leigh, R. A. 1942. Published by Spottiswoode, Ballantyne & Co. Ltd. http://www.janeaustensfamily.co.uk/austen-reading/introduction/introduction.index.html (Accessed 26th May 2016)

[6] Gale Newspapers. 1800 Somerset Assizes ‘The Reading Mercury and Oxford Gazette’ Reading, England, Monday, April 07, 1800; pg. 3; Issue 1993. British Library Newspapers, Part III: 1741-1950. Viewed 1 June 2016.

[7] TNA, Somerset Lent Circuit 1800 ASS1 23 9, Mary Stevens

[8] Gale Newspapers. 1800 Somerset Assizes ‘The Reading Mercury and Oxford Gazette’ Reading, England, Monday, April 07, 1800; pg. 3; Issue 1993. British Library Newspapers, Part III: 1741-1950. Viewed 1 June 2016.

Mary Lees nee Stevens

Over the last month and a half I have been working on my convict assignment for UTAS. There was a lot of other reading and research that I had to do as well. Some of what I have done has already been put up here on my blog, however, much of it has not. So here are the stories that I have written for that unit. There is way more that I could have written but with the time limits and word constraints I have focused very much on the basics.

On the 28th of March 1799 Mary Stevens, a young woman of around 21 with black hair and green eyes,[1] was sentenced to Transportation over the Seas for the term of seven years.[2] Mary had originally been arrested and held at Ilchester Gaol[3] before being remanded in Custody at Taunton Castle to await her trial at the Lent Assizes.[4] Mary had stolen 17 yards of cotton, the property of Thomas Andrews[5], to the value of 30 shillings[6].

04 April 1799 - Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette - Bath, Somerset, England. Find My Past

04 April 1799 – Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette – Bath, Somerset, England. Find My Past

The Lent Assizes of 1799, at Taunton, were presided over by the Judges F. Buller and N. Grose.[7] At the Assize Mary Stevens was the only female to be sentenced to Transportation, although four men received similar sentences. Of those who attended the Assizes with Mary three were sentenced to death and a variety of other sentences were passed including fines and hard labour for some. [8] After the Lent Assize of 1799 Mary remained at Taunton Castle for the next year until the next Lent Assize of 1800. This Assize was presided over by the Justices S. Lawrence and F. Buller.[9] At this Assize Mary’s sentence was confirmed and she was set for ‘Transportation over the Seas’ for the period of seven years.

Once her sentence was confirmed Mary was sent back to Taunton gaol until she was to go on the Ship that would take her to Botany Bay, Australia. In September of 1800 Mary, along with approximately 94-99 other women and 100 men, were moved aboard the Earl Cornwallis, then laying anchor at Downes.[10] The Earl Cornwallis had just been refitted which included it hull sheathed with copper, and the installation of a roundhouse on the stern and a new mast.[11]

Mary and the other convicts were joined by almost another one hundred convicts at Portsmouth on the 14th of September.[12] The Earl Cornwallis then moved onto Cowes on the Isle of Wight where due to Storms and administrative delays the ship was kept at anchor until mid-November.[13] Finally after close to 18 months in different prisons and almost three months aboard the Earl Cornwallis moored in different parts of the Thames, Mary and the almost 300 other convicts plus passengers and crew, started the long journey to Botany Bay.

By Thomas Daniell (1749-1840) - Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, USA, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=36841826

By Thomas Daniell (1749-1840) – Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, USA, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=36841826

The voyage was not without excitement. They reached Rio de Janiero around the 3rd of February 1801where the officer in charge of the guard escort of the convicts, Lieutenant Henry Crawford, fell over board and was drowned.[14] After leaving Rio de Janiero the Earl Cornwallis next dropped anchor at Cape Town. According to Scott the trip from the Cape to Sydney was particularly wet and windy.

“After a passage of 7 weeks from the Cape; it blew a continual Gale of wind most all of the passage, with most tremendous squalls”.[15]

As Mary and the other convicts disembarked in Sydney they had the first sight of their new home, a town that looked like a camp with low straggling houses. [16] It was not long before the convicts got a taste of what their new life would be, with many of them being allocated to work. Mary was assigned to the Soldier John Lees as a Housekeeper.[17]

Edward Dayes, 1763­1804 View of Sydney Cove, New South Wales, from an original picture in the possession of Isaac Clementson Esqr. Call Number: V1 / 1802 / 1 Published date: 1802 Digital ID: a1528669 (Courtesy of the State Library of NSW)

Edward Dayes, 1763­1804 View of Sydney Cove, New South Wales, from an original picture in the possession of Isaac Clementson Esqr. Call Number: V1 / 1802 / 1 Published date: 1802 Digital ID: a1528669 (Courtesy of the State Library of NSW)

It appears that Mary’s new life in Sydney provided her with opportunities that she may not have had in her previous home in Somerset. Just fifteen months after her arrival in Sydney, Mary gave birth to a daughter, Maria Lee, daughter of John Lees and Mary Stevens.[18] This was not the end of Mary and John’s liaison, in fact over the next 20 years Mary was to have ten children with John Lees.[19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] Mary and John were also to marry although not until 1809 after the first five of their children had been born and baptised.[28]

Mary and John did not stay in Sydney. On the 24th of April 1803, just before the birth of their second child, John was discharged from the Army.[29] He was also granted the first of a series of Land Grants in Castlereagh, NSW.[30] This grant of Land meant that John, Mary and their young and growing family could move to Castlereagh and take up the lives of farmers. They worked hard and life was not easy for them. Less than a year after the family moved to Castlereagh they lost everything that they had worked for in a fire that destroyed their home. [31] Fire was not the only disaster to befall the family, they also faced severe floods[32] and caterpillar plagues.[33] Despite all of these challenges, by the time Mary was present at the 1814 Muster the whole family were off stores and supporting themselves off their own land. [34]

Mary and John lived together for 35 years until John died on the 28th of August 1836 at the age of 59. [35] Mary lived for another three years before she also followed him to the grave. [36] Both John and Mary are buried together at the Wesleyan Chapel at Castlereagh.

John Lees tomb stone Authors Collection

John Lees tomb stone
Authors Collection

[1] State Records Authority of New South Wales. Certificate of Emancipation, 1811. 4/4427; COD18, Reel 601 page 522-23. Mary Stevens

[2] TNA, Somerset Lent Circuit 1799 ASS1 23 9, Mary Stevens

[3] State Records Authority of New South Wales, PRO 87, HO 11/1 275-288, Mary Stevens

[4] TNA, Somerset Lent Circuit 1800 ASS1 23 9, Mary Stevens

[5] Find My Past. Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette, 04 April 1799. Mary Stevens.

[6] TNA, Somerset Lent Circuit 1799 ASS1 23 9, Mary Stevens

[7] Google Books. Jeffries, F. The Gentleman’s Magazine (London, England), Volume 85. 1799 Digitised 2011. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=f30dAQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Gentleman%27s+Magazine+vol+85+1799+Jeffries&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixn6yx6ojNAhXBEpQKHeAMD6oQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=Lent&f=false (Accessed 1st June 2016) p 147.

[8] Find My Past. Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette, 04 April 1799. Mary Stevens.

[9] Google Books. Jeffries, F. The Gentleman’s Magazine (London, England), Volume 87. 1800 Digitised 2011. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=uvsRAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=snippet&q=Buller&f=false  (Accessed 1st June 2016) p 176.

[10] NLA MS 1898. Robert Scott, Fifth mate on the Earl Cornwallis, 4th Letter, 2nd September 1800

[11] Griffiths, J. A History of David Brown (1750-1836) and Family. 2016 http://www.davidbrown1801nsw.info/ (Accessed 31st May 2016)

[12] NLA MS 1898. Robert Scott, Fifth mate on the Earl Cornwallis, 5th Letter, 19th September 1800

[13] Griffiths, J. A History of David Brown (1750-1836) and Family. 2016 http://www.davidbrown1801nsw.info/ (Accessed 31st May 2016)

[14] Griffiths, J. A History of David Brown (1750-1836) and Family. 2016 http://www.davidbrown1801nsw.info/ (Accessed 31st May 2016)

[15] NLA MS 1898. Robert Scott, Fifth mate on the Earl Cornwallis, 9th Letter, 16th August 1801

[16] NLA MS 1898. Robert Scott, Fifth mate on the Earl Cornwallis, 9th Letter, 16th August 1801

[17] Marsden’s Female Muster 1806; ML ref: Vol. MSS 18, published in “Musters of New South Wales and Norfolk Island 1805-1806”, edited by Carol J. Baxter, ABGR, Sydney, 1989.; Book Entry# C1164

[18] St Philip’s Church of England, Sydney NSW: Church Register – Baptisms; ML ref: Reel SAG 90.; Vol Entry# 910

[19] NSW BDM 1804 911/1804 V1804911 4 Hannah Lee

[20] NSW BDM 1806 912/1806 V1806912 4 Richard Lee

[21] NSW BDM 1807 2621/1807 V18072621 1A John Leese

[22] NSW BDM 1809 1962/1809 V18091962 1A Mary Lees

[23] NSW BDM 1812 2622/1812 V18122622 1A Esther Lees

[24] NSW BDM 1812 3211/1813 V18133211 1A Samuel Leese

[25] NSW BDM 1815 3784/1815 V18153784 1B Timothy Leese

[26] NSW BDM 1818 4459/1818 V18184459 1B Sarah Leese

[27] NSW BDM 1821 1555/1821 V18211555 162A Cornelius Lees (noted as Sees on the BMD database)

[28] NSW BDM 1809 893/1809 V1809893 3A John Leese and Mary Stephens

[29] Biographical Database of Australia. 1803. Muster Master General’s Index of Casualties &c 102 Foot. Ref: WO25/1342. John Lees http://www.bda-online.org.au/ (accessed 31st May 2016)

[30] Biographical Database of Australia Australian Biographical and Genealogical Record – Series 1 – 1788-1841″, Eds. John T. Spurway and Allison Allen. Pub. ABGR, Sydney, 1992. http://www.bda-online.org.au/ (accessed 31st May 2016)

[31] Trove. 1804 ‘New Bridge.’, The Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser (NSW : 1803 – 1842), 26 February, p. 4. , viewed 31 May 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article626060

[32] Trove. 1806 ‘HAWKESBURY, MARCH 27.’The Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser (NSW : 1803 – 1842), 30 March, p. 2. , viewed 31 May 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article627063

[33] 1810 ‘SYDNEY.’, The Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser (NSW : 1803 – 1842), 29 September, p. 2. , viewed 31 May 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article628077

[34] General Muster of the Inhabitants of New South Wales commencing on 17th October and ending 16th November 1814. edited by Carol J. Baxter, published by ABGR, Sydney, 1987.; Book Entry# 1328

[35] NSW BDM 1836 668/1836 V1836668 20 John Lees

[36] NSW BDM 1839 1027/1839 V18391027 23A Mary Stevens (noted as Stover on the BDM database, both Lees and Stevens on the actual certificate)

Aside

Where am I?

I haven’t stopped writing. I have just had so much writing to do for my Diploma of Family History from UTAS that I have not been able to keep up with it and with writing up my blog as well.

Tomorrow I am hoping to upload the remaining stories that I have written for my Diploma and make them available here so that people can have read the details of the life of Mary Stevens.

Mount Alexander

At some stage between 1855 and 1858 Edwin Gransden ended up at Mount Alexander near Melbourne. Mount Alexander was in the heart of Gold Country and Edwin certainly had an interest in gold as shown by a newspaper article in 1858 showing Edwin asking for a partner in a Puddling Machine. A Puddling Machine, introduced in 1852, is a machine that breaks up gold bearing clay and dirt, with a heavy stone drawn by a horse, allowing gold flecks to sift to the bottom of the channel and be made more accessible.

WANTED a Partner- The advertiser being about putting up a Puddling Machine, wishes to join another as mates in the concern. Any party having a small capital, and wishing to join, may hear of further particulars by addressing a letter to Mr. E.
Gransden, at Mr. Parker’s Mount Franklin, Hepburn.

1858 ‘Advertising.’, Mount Alexander Mail (Vic. : 1854 – 1917), 5 March, p. 1, viewed 1 February, 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article197085694

S. GILL Periton, Devonshire, England 1818 – Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 1880 Australia from 1839 CAMPBELL & FERGUSSON commenced 1854 – 1854 printer, lithographic (organisation) JAMES J. BLUNDELL & CO commenced 1854 – 1867 publisher (organisation) Horse puddling machine, Forest Creek. 1855-56 Courtesy of the Australian National Gallery

S. GILL
Periton, Devonshire, England 1818 – Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 1880
Australia from 1839
CAMPBELL & FERGUSSON
commenced 1854 – 1854
printer, lithographic (organisation)
JAMES J. BLUNDELL & CO
commenced 1854 – 1867
publisher (organisation)
Horse puddling machine, Forest Creek.
1855-56
Courtesy of the Australian National Gallery

Doing some research into Mount Alexander I came across a youtube video that gives a nice potted history of Mount Alexander and what it was like to live there during the Gold Rush years that Edwin Gransden was there for.

Taunton Gaol

For my UTAS course on convicts I have to write a story about one of my convicts and a series of break out stories. Not all of them are assessed but some of them are. This is the break out article I wrote about the Gaol at Taunton where Mary Stevens was held before her Assize Court hearings at Lent of 1799 and 1800.

All I can say, is that I wonder how badly she suffered from Scurvey by the time she got to Sydney Cove. Being a convict on a farm even at the time that she arrived was probably preferable to the life she had lived in the gaols and on the trip to Sydney. I suspect that she also received better food on that farm then she had ever had in her entire life prior to coming to Australia.

Taunton Gaol

The Lent Assizes for the County of Somerset were held at the assize hall in the Castle of Taunton. Thus there was a gaol at Taunton that was used to hold the prisoners close to the Castle so that they were convenient for their Trial at Taunton Castle. The gaol was erected in 1754, expanded in 1815 and later became part of the Police Headquarters for the town of Taunton.[1]

Wiltong Gaol, Taunton. http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=315870.0 This photograph is on a Rootschat forum. If I ever get the details from the person who took the photo I will credit them.

Wilton Gaol, Taunton.
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=315870.0 This photograph is on a Rootschat forum. If I ever get the details from the person who took the photo I will credit them.

The Gaol at Taunton was assessed once in 1803 and once in 1806 with details of the layout written up at the time. Mary Stevens was in the gaol at Taunton, also known as Wilton Gaol, for at least some of her 18 months or so imprisonment in Somersetshire. It is uncertain how much of that time she would have spent at Taunton and how much of that time she would have spent in the gaol at Ilchester.

Whilst in the gaol at Taunton Mary would have been allowed half a quarter loaf per day and a dinner of meat once a fortnight. On this meagre allowance she would have had to survive for the duration of her time at Taunton, unless she could afford to supplement her food. If she had no way to pay for additional food then any extras she may have obtained would have been reliant on the good nature and bounty of others, possibly even her family, if they visited her.[2]

[1] Google Books. Toulmin, J. The history of Taunton, in the county of Somerset. Printed for J. Poole 1822. Original from the University of Michigan. Digitised 18 Dec 2006. P. 585.

[2] Google Books. Neild, J. 1812. State of the prisons in England, Scotland and Wales …: together with some useful documents, observations, and remarks, adapted to explain and improve the condition of prisoners in general … Original from University of Minnesota. Digitised 1 Jul 2010. P. 555 https://books.google.com.au/books?id=SwEMAQAAMAAJ&pg=PR64&lpg=PR64&dq=Taunton+Castle+gaol&source=bl&ots=6ykeJlDCAa&sig=bEdW-GzP54yIG8oPGga9iMlVBQw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiaq6XWyoXNAhWIv48KHQf_AZgQ6AEIRTAJ#v=onepage&q=Taunton%20Castle%20gaol&f=false (Accessed 1st June 2016)

Lieutenant Henry Crawford

I have been so busy writing stories for the Convict unit of my Diploma Course that I have not had any time to put up any blog posts recently. So here is a break out story from the main one I am writing on Mary Stevens. This story if part of my assessment. I will put the main story up at a later date.

Sydney N.S.Wales, 
21st August 1801,
Gentlemen,
By the way of India I had the honor of writing you, a duplicate copy of which accompanies this. The Earl Cornwallis arrived here the 10th June. By that ship I received your letters and their several enclosures, together with the store, provisions, and passengers, the Commissary’s receipt for all which I enclose. The difference between the number of prisoners sent on board and landed here the mater accounts for by their having died of the dysentery during the voyage. Many of those landed are extremely weak and feeble. No complaint has been made of improper treatment during the voyage, and what is very extraordinary no complaint has been made by the agent or master of any very bad behaviour of any of the prisoners during the voyage. On the contrary they both speak to their advantage. I am sorry to observe that Lieut. Henry Crawford, of the New South Wales Corps, was drowned at Rio de Janeiro. The ship was cleared within the time allowed; therefore no demurrage has taken place.[1]

The death of Lieutenant Henry Crawford, overseer of the guard escort for the Convicts, illustrated the gradual increase in power in the Colony of Sydney, exercised by the Rum Corps and eventually leading to the Rum Rebellion.[2]

After the death of Lieutenant Crawford, another officer of the Earl Cornwallis, Lieutenant Marshall decided to swap a quilt and another item for his own, claiming that Lieutenant Crawford owed him money and thus the swap for better equipment made up the amount that Lieutenant Crawford had owed him.[3]

It appeared that Macarthur, at the time the senior officer, whilst both Governor King and the Lieutenant Colonel Paterson were absent, disagreed with Lieutenant Crawford’s intent. Thus he directed an inquiry before a bench of magistrates.[4] The result was that the Magistrates findings were mild with no ill intent attributed to Lieutenant Crawford. Regardless Governor King issued a reprimand. In addition to a reprimand Governor King also informed Lieutenant Marshall that he had obtained a passage for him aboard the Albion to take him back to England. [5]

Captain John Macarthur. Project Gutenburg. http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks13/1302011h.html

Captain John Macarthur. Project Gutenburg. http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks13/1302011h.html

Marshall, apparently did not take this direction well and obviously attributed the situation to Macarthur. So publicly and openly he insulted Macarthur. Equally Macarthur did not take that well and sent Captain Abbott to Marshall to challenge Marshall to a duel which Marshall accepted. Marshall chose Mr. Jeffries, Purser from the Earl Cornwallis as his second. Captain Abbott was Macarthur’s second. However, under the rules of the duel the seconds are supposed to be co-equals in rank. Captain Abbott refused to allow that Mr. Jeffries was his co-equal. Marshall and Jeffries both turned up to the appointed place and at the appointed time for the duel but Macarthur and Abbott did not. So the next time Marshall encountered Abbott he stuck him and claimed that he would do the same to Macarthur when he next saw him. [6]

As a result Marshal was prosecuted and bought before a criminal court. The Judges of the Court consisted of a number of people including five military officers. Not surprisingly Marshall claimed that the court was biased and objected to the five military officers trying the case. His objections were overruled and he was convicted of assaulting Abbott.[7]

As Governor King had considerable doubt about the entire case he eventually decided to remit the sentences passed onto Marshall for assault for fifty pounds and one years imprisonment, as long as Marshall left New South Wales. He also requested that the Court be re-convened due to fresh evidence. However, Governor King received a complaint from the five military officers of the trial, claiming that all members of the court had unanimously declared that it was impossible to reopen the case. Two members, the non-army, members of the court did not agree to the protest. This went on for some time. The upshot was that James Tennant, the commander of the Earl Cornwallis and one other officer, were requested to pay a fine if Marshal did not present himself, on entering Britain, to a court and pay his fifty pound fine and spend his year in gaol.[8]

[1] HRA Series 1.,Vol. 3. p.264

[2] Evatt, H. V. 1938. Rum Rebellion: A study of the Overthrow of Governor Bligh by John Macarthur of the New South Wales Corps. Angus and Robertson, Sydney, Australia.

[3] Trove. 1931 ‘DUELLING DAYS.’, The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842 – 1954), 13 June, p. 9. , viewed 01 Jun 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article16785552

[4] Trove. 1931 ‘DUELLING DAYS.’, The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842 – 1954), 13 June, p. 9. , viewed 01 Jun 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article16785552

[5] Trove. 1931 ‘DUELLING DAYS.’, The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842 – 1954), 13 June, p. 9. , viewed 01 Jun 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article16785552

[6] Trove. 1931 ‘DUELLING DAYS.’, The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842 – 1954), 13 June, p. 9. , viewed 01 Jun 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article16785552

[7] Evatt, H. V. 1938. Rum Rebellion: A study of the Overthrow of Governor Bligh by John Macarthur of the New South Wales Corps. Angus and Robertson, Sydney, Australia.

[8] Trove. 1931 ‘DUELLING DAYS.’, The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842 – 1954), 13 June, p. 9. , viewed 01 Jun 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article16785552

Life in the Gaol of Ilchester

Mary Stevens was Mary was sentenced at Ilchester Court during the Somerset Lent Circuit hearing on 28th March 1799 to “Stealing Goods val. 30/- of Thomas Andrews”. At the Lent Circuit at Taunton in 1800 her sentence was confirmed and she was transported to Australia on the Earl Cornwallis. There are very few Newspaper articles about Mary’s trial and sentence, just a one liner on the 04th of April 1799 – in the Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette – Bath, Somerset, England.

04 April 1799 - Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette - Bath, Somerset, England. Find My Past

04 April 1799 – Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette – Bath, Somerset, England. Find My Past

Just a couple of months after Mary Stevens was going through the ordeal of being tried at the local Ilchester Court and then being taken to the Assizes at Taunton and possibly kept at the Taunton gaol, Jane Leigh Perrott was being held at the Ilchester gaol awaiting her trial at Taunton. Unlike Mary Stevens, Jane Leigh Perrott was in many of the local and National Newspapers for months with full coverage of her trial and statements by herself and all relevant witnesses.

Jane Leigh Perrott was the aunt of Jane Austen. She came from a well off and titled family and had all of the advantages of wealth and birth that Mary Stevens did not have. Thus whereas Mary Stevens was limited to one courtyard room crowded with all the other female prisoners, with no occupation for any of the prisoners so they had little to do with their time. As a result the female ward was described as a place of dissolution and profligacy, just six years later when the gaol was being assessed and improvements organised. The Rise and Progress of the Improvements at Ilchester Gaol 1806-1821

Mary Stevens would have had an uncomfortable time in Ilchester gaol. The experience of Jane Leigh Perrott would have been very different. Much as Jane Leigh Perrott complained of her situation the realities were far less uncomfortable than those of the other female prisoners. Jane, herself was housed in a room adjoining the gaolers rooms. She gives brief descriptions of the gaol and of her situation in the gaol- “Vulgarity, Dirt, Noise from Morning till night…”

…the Man told me that the Dinning Room I was to consider as my own whenever I choose to be along- and so it was till the Fires began; but this Room joins to a Room where the Children all lie, and not Bedlam itself can be half so noisy, beside which, as not one particule [sic] of Smoke goes up the Chimney, except you leave the door or window open, I leave you to judge of the Comfort I can enjoy in such a Room. Austen Papers 1704-1856 Ed by R. A. Austen_Leigh. Ch 7

Jane Leigh Perrott was accused of stealing a card of lace worth twenty shilling from a shop in Bath. She was arrested in August of 1799 but was not able to obtain bail. Thus she stayed with the Ilchester gaoler until the Lent Assize of 1800, the same Assize that Mary Stevens had her sentence confirmed at, before being transported to New South Wales for the term of seven years.

Mary had stolen thirty shillings worth of cotton. Jane had stolen twenty shillings worth of lace. Mary quite probably did it to survive. The trial of Jane Leigh Perrott gives evidence that suggests that Jane stole because she considered the lace that she had stolen to be over priced and that she was entitled to the lace https://austenonly.com/2009/11/28/jane-austens-particular-places-easton-lincolnshire/ Mary was sent to Australia, Jane was acquitted and sent home with her friends. In later life it seems that Jane stole again, yet she was always protected by her family. Mary never had another brush with the law that has been recorded. It is probably an over simplification to put down the differences in their experiences to class, but it would certainly have some impact on the differences in their experiences.

 

5 Generations of Wonderful Mothers

I generated a copy of a Mothers Tree for my mother for Mothers Day. It is quite a lovely tree and has some wonderful women on it. But because it contained details of women who are still living it was not suitable for putting up on this website. However, I really wanted to share the amazing photos that I have going back through generations of mothers. So I have adjusted this Mothers Tree. It only has five generations instead of all of the generations that I had on the original but it is able to be shared as none of these people are still alive.

This is a Mothers Tree of the women in my family. Each of them loses their own name when they marry and thus their stories are often harder to find and harder to tell. So it is very special to have a visual tree of so many of them.

Mothers Tree of Shirley Heather Guest nee Gransden.

Mothers Tree of Shirley Heather Guest nee Gransden.

A Woman’s name

Back in 2011 Geneabloggers did a podcast that focussed on finding female ancestors. One of the things that was bought up very comprehensively in that podcast was the difficulties of tracing women because of their name changes. For example there are the normal name changes when a woman marries a man, but then what happens if she marries two, three or even more times? What happens if she also has a nick name and that is the name that the family knows her as and has written on all of her photos, if there are any, etc?  Sometimes those names may have a link to her name but sometimes they do not. For example I have an Aunty Betty who is not a Betty, or an Elizabeth at all. Her name was Una Jessie and that somehow became Betty. What about all the derivatives of different names, taking the example above Elizabeth could become Betty, Bessie, Eliza, Lizzie, Lizabeth, Lizabet, Bess and the list goes on. Men also have name changes but they do not tend to be as extensive as those for women. It is these name changes that make finding women so difficult in the records.

Given all of this you would think that it would be nice to find some records that actually retain that maiden name and thus make it easier for a descendant to find an ancestor. Today at the NSW State Archives I finally had that experience. A group of records that trace a woman through her maiden name and kept that maiden name for almost the whole of her life. So it came as a surprise to me that I was upset on behalf of my ancestor, that she had been recorded under her maiden name long after the reason for that record had been and passed. You see Mary Stevens was a convict.

Today I looked up Mary Stevens or Stephens in the 1806 Convict Muster, the 1811 Convict Muster, the 1814 Convict General Muster, the General Muster of Land and Stock 1822, and The General Muster List of NSW 1823, 1824 and 1825. In each one of them Mary was mentioned. In the 1806 Muster details given include the Ship that Mary was on and the fact that she was the House Keeper for John Lees. The next two give further details. The 1811 Muster gives the details of Marys trial in Ilchester and her sentence, the 1814 give details of her children and the fact that she is married to John Lees and incorrect details about the ship she came out on, although this is corrected in the Appendix.

Convict Muster 1811- Mary Stevens (Stephens) NSW State Archives courtesy of Ancestry.com

Convict Muster 1811- Mary Stevens (Stephens) NSW State Archives courtesy of Ancestry.com

The difference between the 1806 census and the 1811 and 1814 census is that in 1809 Mary had married John Lees, yet she was still being defined by her name as a convict despite obtaining her Freedome through servitude in 1811. Mary was also being defined by her marriage, the “wife of John Lees” rather than any occupation, even child carer, home duties etc. Her children and husband are all on a separate page together while Mary is on her own page under her maiden name, branded as convict.

Mary Stevens General Muster and land and stock Muster of NSW 1822. NSW State Archives.

Mary Stevens General Muster and land and stock Muster of NSW 1822. NSW State Archives.

The next two musters again define Mary by her convict name and only once that is done do they define her in terms of who she was married to. By the 1837 Muster Mary is no longer mentioned. At this stage it appears that the NSW Government had realised that they had no ability to force those who were free to turn up to convict Musters. I suspect that I am not the only one who finds it a bit upsetting that a person was still being identified by their crime long after they had paid their dues and done their time.

Mary died in 1839. Even here she is an adjunct to her husband as her tomb stone has just her name, no other details and it is at the foot of the tomb stone of John Lees. In the register book her name is Mary Stevens, wife of John Lees. In many ways it is great to be able to find Mary and follow her through her life. In other ways it is upsetting that Mary is defined not by who she is but by the one time she was caught doing something wrong and by her husband. Once in Australia there is no evidence that Mary ever committed another crime yet her crime defines her life.

John Lees tomb stone Authors Collection

John Lees tomb stone
Authors Collection

Mary Stevens nee Lees Authors Collection

Mary Stevens nee Lees
Authors Collection

Sydney as seen by Mary Stevens

Between 1800-1803 a French expedition lead by Nicholas Baudin travelled along the coast of Australia with the intention of mapping the coast of “New Holland”. The expedition did not arrive in the Sydney area until 1801 just prior to the arrival of the Earl of Cornwallis. On the Earl of Cornwallis was a young convict woman named Mary Stevens, along with 193 male convicts and another 94 female convicts and some free settlers. Mary Stevens is the Convict Ancestor that I am following for my unit on Convicts at UTAS.

By Thomas Daniell (1749-1840) - Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, USA, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=36841826

By Thomas Daniell (1749-1840) – Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, USA, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=36841826

The Baudin expedition contained two ships the Geographe and Le Naturaliste, they reached Port Jackson in June 1801. François Péron was on this expedition and he kept a record of his arrival in Sydney. The sights that he saw would have been the same ones that Mary Stevens would also have seen as she arrived in Sydney aboard the Earl Cornwallis just a short while later.

Géographe and the Naturaliste DateEarly 19th Century Source	avaloncoastalretreat.com.au

Géographe and the Naturaliste
Date Early 19th Century
Source avaloncoastalretreat.com.au

Towards the middle of this magnificent port, and on its southern bank, in one of the principal creeks, rises Sydney Town, the capital of the country of Cumberland, and of all the English colonies in this part of the world; seated at the base of two hills, that are contiguous to each other and having the advantage of a rivulet, which runs completely through it; this infant town affords a view, at once agreeable and picturesque. To the right, and at the north point of Sydney Cove, you perceive the signal battery, which is built upon a rock, difficult of access; six pieces of cannon, protected by a turf entrenchment, cross their fire with that of another battery, which I shall presently mention; and thus defend, in the most effectual manner the approach to the harbour and the town. Further on, appear the large buildings that form the hospital, and which are capable of containing two or three hundred sick. Amongst these buildings, there is one particularly worthy of notice, as all the parts of it were prepared in Europe, and brought out in Commodore Phillip’s squadron; so that in a few days after its arrival, there was an hospital ready to receive such of the crews as were sick. On the same side of the town, at the sea shore, you observe a very fine magazine, to which the largest ships can come up, and discharge their cargoes. In the same direction are several private docks, in which are built brigs and cutters, of different sizes, for the purpose of trading either inland or beyond the colony. These vessels which are from fifty to three hundred tons burthen, are built entirely with the native wood; even their masts are obtained from the forests of the colony. It is at the spot called Hospital Creek, that the ships of individuals unload their cargoes. Beyond the hospital in the same line is the prison, which has several dungeons capable of holding from an hundred and fifty to two hundred prisoners; it is surrounded by a high and strong wall, and has a numerous guard on duty, both by day and night. A short distance from the prison is the storehouse, for the reception of wines, spirituous liquors, salt provisions etc. In the front of it is the armoury where the garrison is drawn up every morning; accompanied by a numerous and well composed band, belonging to the New south Wales regiment. The whole western part of this spot, is occupied by the house of the lieutenant governor general; behind which is vast garden which is worth the attention both of the philosopher and the naturalists on account of the great number of useful vegetables which are cultivated in it; and which have been procured from every part of the world by its present respectable possessor, Mr. Paterson, a distinguished traveller, and member of the Royal Society of London. Behind the house and the magazine just mentioned is the public school; here are educated in the principles or religion morals and virtue, those young females who are the hope of the rising colony; but whose parents are either too degenerate too poor to give them proper instruction. In the public school however, under respectable matrons, they are taught from their earliest years, all the duties of a good mother or a family. Behind the house of the lieutenant governor in a large magazine , are deposited all the dried pulse and corn, belonging to the state. It is a sort of public granary intended for the support of the troops and the people who receive their subsistence from the government. The barracks occupy a considerable square, and have in front several field pieces; the edifices for the accommodation of the officers, form the lateral parts or ends of the building; and the powder magazine is in the middle. Near this, in a small private house, the principal civil and military officers assemble. It is a sort of coffee house, maintained by subscription, in which there are several amusements but particularly billiards, at which any person may play, free of expense. Behind the armoury is a large square tower, which serves for an observatory to those English officers who study astronomy.